U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco

Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 22, 2008
294 F. App'x 285

Counsel

Ethan A. Balogh, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, Elliot R. Peters, Esq., Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Randolph Daar, Esq., Serra, Lichter, Daar, Bustamante, Gilg & Greenberger, Pier, Five, North, John Houston Scott, Esq., The Scott Law Firm, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Christine Van Aken, Esq., Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, CA for Defendant-Appellant.

Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellee Antoine Goffs Motion to Dismiss Claim Against George Butterworth, for Entry of Judgment in Butterworth’s Favor, and for Resubmission of Pending Appeals is GRANTED.

These cases are resubmitted for decision as of the filed date of this Order.

Butterworth’s appeal is dismissed and his case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of entering judgment in Goffs lawsuit against Butterworth in Butterworth’s favor. No costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.