U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Romero

United States v. Romero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 3, 2008 · Hawkins, Rawlinson, Smith
298 F. App'x 603

United States v. Romero

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Romero appeals from the 98-month sentence imposed following a second remand for resentencing.

*604Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Romero’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*604ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.