United States v. Garcia-Perez
United States v. Garcia-Perez
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Juan Garcia-Perez appeals from the 41-
Gareia-Perez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it overstates his conduct of conviction and double counts his criminal history. We conclude that Garcia-Perez’s sentence is not procedurally or substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Zavala v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 2491, 171 L.Ed.2d 780 (2008); United States v. Lunar-Herrera, 149 F.3d 1054, 1055-56 (9th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.