McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC, 588 F.3d 1236 (9th Cir. 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26796; 2009 WL 4643227

McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McFarland (“McFarland”) appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment to Guardsmark, LLC in this dispute arising under Cal. Labor Code § 512. McFarland v. Guardsmark, LLC, 538 F.Supp.2d 1209(N.D.Cal. 2008). The district court dismissed the remaining claims upon stipulation of the parties. We affirm for the reasons set out in the district court’s thorough decision.

McFarland raises for the first time on appeal the factual issue of whether his signed employment agreement represents an actual agreement to take two on-duty meal periods in a single day. As McFarland did not raise this issue before the district court, see id., we do not consider it here. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Johnny MCFARLAND, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GUARDSMARK, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Published