U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC

McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 9, 2009 · Hug, Rymer, McKeown
588 F.3d 1236; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26796; 2009 WL 4643227 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McFarland (“McFarland”) appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment to Guardsmark, LLC in this dispute arising under Cal. Labor Code § 512. McFarland v. Guardsmark, LLC, 538 F.Supp.2d 1209(N.D.Cal. 2008). The district court dismissed the remaining claims upon stipulation of the parties. We affirm for the reasons set out in the district court’s thorough decision.

McFarland raises for the first time on appeal the factual issue of whether his signed employment agreement represents an actual agreement to take two on-duty meal periods in a single day. As McFarland did not raise this issue before the district court, see id., we do not consider it here. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.