U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Doody v. Schriro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 12, 2009 · Kozinski, Hawkins, Silverman

566 F.3d 839; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10935; 2009 WL 1364431 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Kim Christensen Clark, Esquire, Step-toe & Johnson, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Nathan Z. Dershowitz, Esquire, Victoria B. Eiger, Esquire, Dershowitz Eiger & Adelson,.PC, New York, NY, for Petitioner-Appellant., Joseph Thomas Maziarz, Jon Anderson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Diane M. Ramsey, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Doody v. Ryan (9th Cir. 2011)
Doody v. Schriro (9th Cir. 2010)
Doody v. Schriro (9th Cir. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges HAWKINS and SILVERMAN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.