U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Humberto Torres-Moran

United States v. Humberto Torres-Moran
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 17, 2009
334 F. App'x 135

United States v. Humberto Torres-Moran

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 17 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30253 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00276-MJP-1 v. MEMORANDUM * HUMBERTO MORAN-TORRES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 **

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Humberto Moran-Torres appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 17- month, two-week sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DRS/Research U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moran- Torres’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

DRS/Research 2 09-30253

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.