J. Guadalupe Magana Marquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677 *853 (9th Cir. 2004), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

Because Magana Marquez failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice, he may not at this point collaterally attack his 1997 deportation order. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 683 F.2d 174, 175-76 (9th Cir. 1980) (per curiam).

The BIA properly concluded that Magana Marquez is not eligible for a waiver under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act because he is no longer a legal permanent resident. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(1).

Magana Marquez failed to exhaust his remaining contentions. See Barron, 358 F.3d at 678 (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.