*1003 MEMORANDUM **

Maria Socorro Agasino (Agasino) petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying her petition to reopen her case to seek relief pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c).

Agasino raised the argument that retroactive application of the expanded “aggravated felony” definition violates due process in her prior petition, so it is now barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion. See In re Reynoso, 477 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2007). Likewise, Agasino could have raised her claim that application of the expanded definition violates her right to equal protection, so that claim is barried by the doctrine of claim preclusion. See United States v. Bhatia, 545 F.3d 757, 759 (9th Cir. 2008). Because Agasino is not entitled to relief, the BIA acted within its discretion when it denied Agasino’s motion to reopen proceedings. See Bunty Ngaeth v. Mukasey, 545 F.3d 796, 799-800 (9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.