United States v. Thai

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Thai, 357 F. App'x 159 (9th Cir. 2009)

United States v. Thai

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 11 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-30408

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-05-00347-TSZ v.

MEMORANDUM * HOANG MUNG THAI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Thomas S. Zilly, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Hoang Mung Thai appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed upon a remand for resentencing, following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). EF/Research intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Thai’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. EF/Research 2 07-30408

Reference

Status
Unpublished