United States v. Kenneth Slayton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Kenneth Slayton

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 11 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50388

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00623-RGK v.

MEMORANDUM * KENNETH SLAYTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Slayton appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 72-month sentence for distribution of cocaine base in the form of crack cocaine, in violation

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). EF/Research of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(iii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Slayton’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. EF/Research 2 08-50388

Reference

Status
Unpublished