United States v. Mirno Pliego-Sanchez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Mirno Pliego-Sanchez, 357 F. App'x 955 (9th Cir. 2009)
Alarcón, Trott, Tashima

United States v. Mirno Pliego-Sanchez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mirno Pliego-Sanchez appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed for his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pliego-Sanchez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mirno PLIEGO-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished