U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Julia Garcia

United States v. Julia Garcia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 16, 2009

United States v. Julia Garcia

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10127 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:06-CR-00417-LJO v. MEMORANDUM * JULIA GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Julia Garcia appeals from her jury-trial conviction and 37-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DAT/Research Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

DAT/Research 2 08-10127

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.