United States v. Brandon Dancy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Brandon Dancy, 357 F. App'x 932 (9th Cir. 2009)

United States v. Brandon Dancy

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50550

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00114-VBF v.

MEMORANDUM * BRANDON LAMAR DANCY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Brandon Lamar Dancy appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 77- month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DAT/Research

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Dancy’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. DAT/Research 2 08-50550

Reference

Status
Unpublished