United States v. Brandon Dancy
United States v. Brandon Dancy
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50550
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00114-VBF v.
MEMORANDUM * BRANDON LAMAR DANCY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Brandon Lamar Dancy appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 77- month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DAT/Research
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Dancy’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. DAT/Research 2 08-50550
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished