MEMORANDUM **

Resham Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of *923 Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Gonz alez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that even if Singh were credible, the government established by a preponderance of the evidence that Singh could reasonably relocate within India. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(3)(ii); Sowe v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1281, 1286-87 (9th Cir. 2008) (the presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution can be rebutted by showing that the applicant could avoid future persecution by relocation). Accordingly, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Gonzalez-Hernandez, 336 F.3d at 1001 n. 5.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Singh failed to demonstrate that it was more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to India. See Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.