U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Steven Kinney

United States v. Steven Kinney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2009

United States v. Steven Kinney

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 17 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10306 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00080-LDG v. MEMORANDUM * STEVEN KINNEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009 ** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Steven Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s May 29, 2008, order denying his requests for documents and to unseal a portion of the record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SZ/Research The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Kinney’s post- judgment motions.

AFFIRMED.

SZ/Research 2 08-10306

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.