Armando Gonzalez-Oregon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We re *921 view de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

We agree with the BIA’s conclusion that Gonzalez-Oregon has not established prejudice from his prior counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance. See Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 901-02; see also Lin, 377 F.3d at 1027 (to demonstrate prejudice, a petitioner must demonstrate “plausible grounds for relief’). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 903.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.