Falcon Stainless, Inc. v. Rino Companies, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 28, 2009

Falcon Stainless, Inc. v. Rino Companies, Inc., 360 F. App'x 825 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Falcon Stainless, Inc. appeals the district court’s denial of its request for pre *826 liminary injunctive relief against defendant-appellees Rino Companies, Inc., Performance Sales, Inc., Southsea Metal, Inc., John Novello and Herry Rieger. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: FALCON STAINLESS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. RINO COMPANIES, INC., Dba Rino Flex Connectors, Dba Performance Sales, a California Corp.; Et Al., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, and Hampton-Condon Sales, Inc., Counter-Claimant
Status: Unpublished