U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2009
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, No. 04-16688

Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. v. CV-01-02252-MJJ

WAL-MART, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

 BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720 KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No.

CV-01-02252-MJJ v. ORDER

WAL-MART, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Filed February 13, 2009 ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

1935

1936 DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC.

Judges McKeown, Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.