U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2009

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, No. 04-16688 Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. v. CV-01-02252-MJJ WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellant.  BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720 KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No. CV-01-02252-MJJ v. ORDER WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee.  Filed February 13, 2009

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

1935 1936 DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC. Judges McKeown, Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.