Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON; CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, No. 04-16688
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. CV-01-02252-MJJ
WAL-MART, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON; CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720 KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.
CV-01-02252-MJJ v. ORDER
WAL-MART, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Filed February 13, 2009 ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
1935
1936 DUKES v. WAL-MART, INC.
Judges McKeown, Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.