U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Bull v. City and County of San Francisco

Bull v. City and County of San Francisco
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 20, 2009

Bull v. City and County of San Francisco

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARY BULL; JONAH ZERN, and all  others similarly situated; LAURA TIMBROOK; LEIGH FLEMING; CHARLI JOHNSON; MICKY MANGOSING; ALEXIS BRONSON; MARCY CORNEAU; LISA GIAMPAOLI, No. 05-17080 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.  D.C. No. CV-03-01840-CRB CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff; SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES, Defendants-Appellants.  MARY BULL; JONAH ZERN, and all  others similarly situated; LAURA TIMBROOK; LEIGH FLEMING; CHARLI JOHNSON; MICKY MANGOSING; ALEXIS BRONSON; MARCY CORNEAU; No. 06-15566 LISA GIAMPAOLI, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v.  CV-03-01840-CRB/ EMC CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN ORDER FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff; SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES, Defendants-Appellants.  2321 2322 BULL v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Filed February 20, 2009

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.