Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino v. Renoir

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION  RICHARD GUINO, a french trust,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

JEAN-EMMANUEL RENOIR, an No. 07-15582 individual,

Defendant-Appellant,  D.C. No. CV-03-01310-MHM and

BESEDER INC., doing business as

Rima Fine Art; DROR DAREL, husband; TRACY L. PENWELL, wife,

Defendants.  SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION  RICHARD GUINO, a french trust,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

JEAN-EMMANUEL RENOIR, an No. 07-15583 individual,

Defendant,  D.C. No. CV-03-01310-MHM and

BESEDER INC., doing business as

Rima Fine Art; DROR DAREL, husband; TRACY L. PENWELL, wife,

Defendants-Appellants. 

3897 3898 SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION v. RENOIR

SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION  RICHARD GUINO, a french trust,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

RICHARD W. MORRIS; MORRIS LAW No. 07-17209 FIRM, PLLC, D.C. No. Appellants, CV-03-01310-MHM v.  ORDER DENYING JEAN-EMMANUEL RENOIR, an PETITIONS FOR individual; BESEDER INC., doing REHEARING EN business as Rima Fine Art; DROR BANC DAREL, husband; TRACY L.

PENWELL, wife,

Defendants-Appellees.  Filed April 1, 2009 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Schroeder and Judge Reinhardt voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehear- ing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed. R. App. P. 35.)

The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.