Linkline v. Sbc California, Inc.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;  INREACH INTERNET LLC; OM

NETWORKS, dba Omsoft

Technologies, Inc.; NITELOG, INC., dba Red Shift Internet Services, No. 05-56023 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.  D.C. No. CV-03-05265-SVW SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific ORDER Bell Telephone Company; PACIFIC

BELL INTERNET SERVICES; SBC

ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 9, 2009 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 1109 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision, 4161 4162 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS v. SBC CALIFORNIA including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REMANDED.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.