Sierra Club v. Dot

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION;  PUBLIC CITIZEN; ENVIRONMENTAL

LAW FOUNDATION; BROTHERHOOD OF

TEAMSTERS AND AUTO TRUCK

DRIVERS LOCAL NO. 70,

Petitioners, v.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; No. 07-73415 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY  FMCSA No. ADMINISTRATION; RAYMOND L. 07-1355 LAHOOD,* Secretary of

Transportation; ROSE A.

MCMURRAY,** Acting

Administrator of the Federal

Motor Carrier Safety

Administration; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Respondents. 

*Raymond L. LaHood is substituted for his predecessor, Mary E. Peters, as Secretary of Transportation. Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **Rose A. McMurray, Acting Administrator, is substituted for her pre- decessor, John H. Hill, who was the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

4461 4462 SIERRA CLUB v. DOT

OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT 

DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

No. 07-73987 Petitioner, v.  FMCSA No. 07-1355 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY

ORDER ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Argued and Submitted

February 12, 2008—San Francisco, California Filed April 20, 2009

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Jonathan Weissglass, Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, California, for petitioners The Sierra Club Foundation, Public Citizen, Environmental Law Foundation, and Brotherhood of Teamsters and Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70.

Paul D. Cullen, Sr., The Cullen Law Firm, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Associa- tion, Inc.

Irene M. Solet, United States Department of Justice, Civil Appellate Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondents. SIERRA CLUB v. DOT 4463 ORDER

Petitioners Sierra Club, et al., and Owner-Operator Inde- pendent Drivers Association petition this court for review of the notice of intent by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) to proceed with a pilot program to authorize up to 100 Mexico-domiciled carriers to operate beyond the border zone. We dismiss because this petition is now moot.

While the petition was pending, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Pub. L. 111-8, 123 Stat. 524. Section 136 of that legis- lation prohibits the use of funds appropriated under it “to establish, implement, continue, promote or in any way per- mit” a demonstration program like the one at issue in this case.

Pursuant to § 136, the FMCSA has terminated the existing demonstration program. Even if Congress does not impose the same limitation in future fiscal years, any new pilot program the FMCSA might initiate in the future would likely present different questions of statutory and regulatory requirements than the now terminated program and would likely not fall into the “yet evading review” category. Accordingly, the peti- tion for review is moot.

DISMISSED.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.