U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

In re Stewart

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2009 · Kleinfeld, Lawson, Tallman

334 Fed. Appx. 854; 334 F. App'x 854; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23316; 2009 WL 3389635

Counsel

Kathleen P. March, The Bankruptcy Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

T Street LLC v. Jaques (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho 2020)
In re: Cpesaz Liquidating, Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2022)
In re: Morry Waksberg M.D., Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2015)
In re: Morry Waksberg M.D., Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

The appellant, The Bankruptcy Law Firm, P.C., through its principal attorney, Kathleen P. March, who served as the debtor’s attorney, appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the Central District of California bankruptcy court’s order disallowing certain fees under 11 U.S.C. § 330 for counsel’s representation of the debtor in his Chapter 13 case. The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s fee determination. We ordered the matter to be submitted on briefs. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

After carefully reviewing the record, the controlling law, and the appellant’s brief, we conclude that issuance of a full opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative. We AFFIRM, for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s opinion.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.