U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino v. Renoir

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2009 · Nelson, Reinhardt, Schroeder

561 F.3d 969; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6867; 2009 WL 839329 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Richard W. Morris, Esquire, Artemio Reategui, Esquire, Richard W. Stevens, Morris Law Firm, PLLC, Surprise, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Michael R. Hambly, Esquire, David Paul Steiner, Esquire, David Steiner & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, Ray K. Harris, Esquire, Fennemore Craig PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant., Phil Scot Flemming, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, Joshua J. Kaufman, Esquire, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

SOCIETE CIVILE SUCCESSION GUINO v. Renoir (9th Cir. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

070rehearing

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

Judge Schroeder and Judge Reinhardt voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed. R.App. P. 35.)

The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.