U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Do Sung Uhm v. Humana Inc.

Do Sung Uhm v. Humana Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2009 · Berzon, Fletcher, Paez
573 F.3d 865; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16107 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Scott C. Breneman, Breneman Law Firm, Joseph Andrew Grube, Ricci Grube Aita, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Brian D. Boyle, Mark Davies, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, Mary Rebecca Knack, Williams Kastner & Gibbs, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees., D.C. No. CV-06-00185-RSM, Western District of Washington, Seattle.

Do Sung Uhm v. Humana Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellees’ request for reconsideration shall be treated as a petition for panel rehearing and is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 25, 2008 and reported at 540 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2008) is WITHDRAWN and shall not be cited as precedent. The petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The panel will file a new disposition in due course.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.