U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Flores v. Arizona

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 13, 2009 · Berzon, Fletcher, Rawlinson

577 F.3d 1014; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18092 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Joy Ellen Herr-Cardillo, Tucson, AZ, Timothy M. Hogan, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., D. Aaron Brown, Attorney Advisor, David J. Cantelme, Esquire, Cantelme & Brown, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Intervenor., Lynne Christensen Adams, Kimberly Anne Demarchi, David Dickson Garner, Esquire, Lewis & Roca, LLP, Susan M. Segal, Esquire, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, Jose A. Cardenas, Esquire, Arizona State University Office of General Counsel, Tempe, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee., Lynne Christensen Adams, Jose A. Cardenas, Esquire, Kimberly Anne Demarchi, David Dickson Garner, Esquire, Susan M. Segal, Esquire, for Defendants., Eric J. Bistrow, Esquire, Burch & Cracchiolo, PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Flores v. State (9th Cir. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We remand this case to the District Court to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision in Horne v. Flores, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2579, 2607, 174 L.Ed.2d 406 (2009).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.