U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Sorcia-Quintana

United States v. Sorcia-Quintana
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2009 · Bybee, Callahan, Scannlain
310 F. App'x 147

United States v. Sorcia-Quintana

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Mario Sorcia-Quintana appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sorcia-Quintana contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider and address arguments made by defense counsel at sentencing. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Catty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.