White v. Geren
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Flores v. ODOC (District Court, D. Oregon 2023)
- Epperson v. United States (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- Epperson v. Foreign Ministry Affairs (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- Epperson v. Foreign Ministry Affairs (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- Jossy v. State of Hawaii (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Vergie H. White appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her action alleging race discrimination against minority employees at Edwards Air Force Base. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order dismissing for failure to state a claim. Ortez v. Washington County, 88 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed White’s Title VII claim because White did not fully exhaust her administrative remedies. See Jasch v. Potter, 302 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2002) (“In order to bring a Title VII cause of action against a federal government agency in district court, [plaintiff] must first exhaust his administrative remedies.”).
The district court properly dismissed White’s class action claims because White, proceeding pro se, was not an adequate class representative. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4) (requiring that class representative be able to “fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class”); McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966) (holding that a lay person lacks authority to appear as an attorney for others).
White’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.