U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Phillips v. City of Oakland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 27, 2009 · Bybee, Scannlain, Silverman

311 F. App'x 14

Counsel

John Phillips, Oakland, CA, pro se., Rachel Wagner, Esquire, Office of The City Attorney, Oakland, CA, Michael T. Pyle, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Francisco, CA, Jill T. Bowers, Esquire, AGCA— Office of The California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Maehr v. United States (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s final judgment. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affir-manee appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.