U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Remmert v. Venoya

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 28, 2009 · Bybee, Scannlain, Silverman

311 F. App'x 28

Counsel

Shirley Venoya Remmert, Menlo Park, CA, pro se., Delfín M. Venoya, Redwood City, CA, pro se., State OF California Attorney General’s Office, Sacramento, CA, pro se., Superior Court of San Mateo County, Redwood City, CA, pro se., Portor Goltz, County Counsel, Redwood City, CA, pro se., US Trustee’s Office, San Francisco, CA, pro se.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, this court hereby summarily affirms the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order denying appellant’s request for in-junctive relief. See United States v. Hoo-ton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per cu-riam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.