U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber

A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 12, 2009 · Conlon, Noonan, Silverman
311 F. App'x 966

Counsel

Evan Granowitz, Shulman Hodges & Bastían LLP, Foothill Ranch, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., James D. Henderson, Jr., Esquire, Law Offices of James D. Henderson, Jr., Alan H. Finkel, Esquire, Zimmermann Koomer Connolly Finkel & Gosselin, LLP, Los An-geles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees., Ronald J. Davis, II, Esquire, Law Offices of Ronald J. Davis, II, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendants.

A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On January 7, 2009, Appellant moved this court for clarification regarding the district court’s denial of a joint stipulation on attorney-client privileged documents. Appellant’s unopposed motion for clarification is granted. The district court abused its discretion in summarily denying the proposed order for lack of good cause. The district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the portion of the proposed order that would require the clerk to redact privileged material from filed pleadings. The district court’s denial of the parties’ joint stipulation is REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.