Berumen v. Holder
Berumen v. Holder
312 F. App'x 33
Berumen v. Holder
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Because petitioner hasn’t shown good cause for his “failure to inquire as to the status of his” court date, he can’t demonstrate “reasonable cause” — let alone “exceptional circumstances” — in support of his motion to reopen. Hernandez-Vivas v. I.N.S., 23 F.3d 1557, 1560 (9th Cir. 1994); Valencia-Fragoso v. I.N.S., 321 F.3d 1204, 1205-06 (9th Cir. 2003). Under either standard, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion. See Hernandez-Vivas, 23 F.3d at 1560.
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.