U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Vasquez Martinez v. Holder

Vasquez Martinez v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2009 · Beezer, Fernandez, Fletcher
313 F. App'x 990

Vasquez Martinez v. Holder

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Victor Hugo Vasquez Martinez and Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se *991for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal' from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying-relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

Petitioners’ contention that the agency violated due process in their case by not considering the equities and by misapplying the law to the facts is unsupported by the record and therefore does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. Id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.