U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Diaz-Navarro

United States v. Diaz-Navarro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2009 · Beezer, Fernandez, Fletcher
314 F. App'x 80

United States v. Diaz-Navarro

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Antonio Diaz-Navarro appeals from the 66-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Diaz-Navarro contends that the district court erred during sentencing by failing to consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. We conclude that there was no procedural error. See United States v. Catty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)(2)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.