United States v. Warrant
United States v. Warrant
314 F. App'x 85
United States v. Warrant
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Shane Travis Warrant appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Warrant contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because evidence obtained during a traffic stop was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Warrant waived the right to appeal this issue when he entered an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.