Torres v. Holder
Torres v. Holder
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Jaime Torres and Dilia Margarita Bel-tran Landeros, spouses and natives and
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen because the successive motion to reopen was filed more than two years after the BIA’s December 10, 2003 order dismissing the underlying appeal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (motion to reopen generally must be filed within 90 days of the final order), and Petitioners failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.