U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

International Norcent Technology v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics

International Norcent Technology v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2009 · Kozinski, Pregerson, Quist
323 F. App'x 571

International Norcent Technology v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

*572We review de novo the district court’s order dismissing Nor cent’s complaint for failure to state a claim, taking the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construing them in a light favorable to plaintiff. Les Shockley Racing, Inc. v. Nat’l Hot Rod Ass’n, 884 F.2d 504, 507 (9th Cir. 1989). Norcent did not plead facts with adequate specificity to state a claim. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*572ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.