U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Ramirez Villalobos v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2009 · Bea, Gould, Graber

324 F. App'x 676

Counsel

Javier Ramirez Villalobos, Monrovia, CA, pro se., Maria Elena Ramirez, Monrovia, CA, pro se., OIL, John J.W. Inkeles, Esquire, Trial, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Ramirez Villalobos and Maria Elena Ramirez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying their application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.