U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Arellano-Ochoa

United States v. Arellano-Ochoa
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2009 · Schroeder, Thomas, Wardlaw
329 F. App'x 163

United States v. Arellano-Ochoa

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Arellano-Ochoa appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Arellano-Ochoa contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately consider all of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that his sentence is excessive in light of his mitigating circumstances. The district court did not procedurally err and Arellano-Ochoa’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.