Armedilla v. Holder
Armedilla v. Holder
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Rodrigo Ilaw Armedilla, native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Armedilla failed to satisfy his burden of establishing that his marriage was entered into in good faith where he did not submit sufficient documentation indicating that he and his former wife intended to establish a life together at the time of their marriage. Cf. Damon, 360 F.3d at 1089 (evidence of courtship, wedding ceremony, shared finances, and shared residence was substantial evidence of intent to establish life together); see also Bark v. INS, 511 F.2d 1200, 1202 (9th Cir. 1975) (“time and extent of separation, combined with other facts and circumstances, can and have adequately supported the conclusion that a marriage was not bona fide”).
Armedilla’s remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.