U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

Santillana v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 13, 2009 · Ikuta, Kleinfeld, Smith

331 F. App'x 517

Counsel

Ravit Rae Halperin, Esq., Korenberg Abramowitz & Feldun A Law Corporation, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner., CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Edward Earl Wig-gers, Esquire, Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Ponciano R. Santillana, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ or-*518dei” dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s refusal to reopen proceedings sua sponte. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.