U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Godinez

United States v. Godinez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 2, 2009 · Clifton, Rawlinson, Silverman
346 F. App'x 291

United States v. Godinez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Alejandro Lopez Godinez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence imposed for possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking crimes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)®.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Godinez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.