Singh v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Singh v. Holder, 356 F. App'x 941 (9th Cir. 2009)
Alarcón, Tashima, Trott

Singh v. Holder

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Gurdeep Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over eighteen months after the BIA’s final decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen the case. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gurdeep SINGH v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General
Status
Published