John Macmullin v. William Poach, Jr.
John Macmullin v. William Poach, Jr.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 29 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN MACMULLIN, No. 09-15652 Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00768-FJM v. MEMORANDUM * WILLIAM G. POACH, Jr.; LYNN M.
ANDERSON; DONALD CHILDERS; PETER M. WILLIAMS; MARION HUBBARD; PATRICIA A. OROZCO Judge; DIANE M. JOHNSEN; G.
MURRAY SNOW, Judge; LINDSAY ELLIS, Commissioner; MICHAEL D.
HINTZE, Commissioner, Appellees, and RUSSELL BROWN, Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Submitted April 13, 2010 ** San Francisco, California Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
John MacMullin appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order modifying the automatic stay to permit the probate of Sylvia Levering’s Estate to continue and referring all questions relating to the merits of attorney’s fees and costs awarded during probate proceedings to the probate court.
After reviewing the record and the briefs, we affirm for the reasons given by the district court in its decision. As explained in Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), the probate exception to bankruptcy jurisdiction applies to claims against the res in the custody of the state court and to matters internal to the probate of the will.
We construe MacMullin’s “motion re: record” as a request for judicial notice of records that were not before the bankruptcy court and deny.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.