U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Chiu Hung Wong v. Holder

Chiu Hung Wong v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2010 · Canby, Thomas, Fletcher
380 F. App'x 730

Counsel

Chiu Hung Wong, Oakland, CA, pro se., Kristin Edison, OIL, Katharine Clark, Esquire, Trial, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Chiu Hung Wong v. Holder

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Chiu Hung Wong, a native and citizen of Hong Kong, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. The government’s renewed mo *731 tion to remand this petition for review to the BIA is granted over Wong’s opposition.

We therefore do not reach the merits of Wong’s petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.