U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder

Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2010 · Canby, Thomas, Fletcher
381 F. App'x 716

Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Qiaoli Zhong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection un *717 der the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008), and we grant the petition for review, and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s adverse credibility determination. See Bandari v. INS, 227 F.3d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2000). The inconsistencies as to whether the police officers who beat Zhong were in plainclothes, and the discrepancies between Zheng’s testimony and the hospital report regarding bruises on his forehead, are minor discrepancies in relation to Zheng’s otherwise detailed, consistent testimony of the beating, and his documentation of other more serious injuries. See id. at 1166-67 (minor discrepancies, in light of otherwise consistent testimony, could not form the basis for an adverse credibility determination).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review, and remand for the agency to consider Zhong’s claims for relief, taking his testimony as true. See Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1093-96 (9th Cir. 2009); see also INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.