MEMORANDUM **

Rosalina Velasquez Garfias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *754 view of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The Board did not abuse its discretion in concluding that new evidence regarding Garfias’s daughter was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (recognizing that Board’s denial of motion to reopen shall be reversed only if “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law”).

To the extent Garfias challenges the Board’s refusal to reopen proceedings sua sponte, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.