U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Jose Miranda-Navarete v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Jose Miranda-Navarete v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 10, 2010 · Canby, Thomas, Fletcher
383 F. App'x 605

Counsel

Xavier Gonzales, Xavier Gonzales, Attorney at Law, P.C., Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner., Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Emily Anne Radford, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Jose Miranda-Navarete v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Antonio Miranda-Navarete, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under § 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that Miranda-Navarete failed to establish that denying him admission would result in extreme hardship to his United States citizen mother and children. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[A]n exceptional and extremely unusual hardship determination is a subjective discretionary judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.