U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

James Salsman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

James Salsman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2010 · Canby, Thomas, Fletcher
383 F. App'x 674

James Salsman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

James Salsman petitions pro se for review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (“NRC”) decision denying his petition for rulemaking to amend NRC’s regulations concerning the environmental and exposure limits for heavy metal ra-dionuclides, and to reclassify uranium solubility. See 10 C.F.R. Part 20. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of Article III standing because Salsman did not demonstrate that he suffered an “injury in fact” that is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.